October 2, 2026
Counterfeit Parts, Drop Shipping and Trade Mark Use: Federal Court decides
Aftermarket parts sellers regularly need to refer to vehicle brands so customers know which models their products are designed to fit. The difficulty is that there can be a fine…
September 25, 2026
BASMATI and Certification Marks: Federal Court Upholds Refusal
Basmati is a familiar name on supermarket shelves, but that familiarity does not necessarily mean the word can function as a certification trade mark. That was the issue before…
September 19, 2026
From Fence Profile to $2 Million Damages: A Long-Running Design Dispute
The dispute between Gram Engineering Pty Ltd and BlueScope Steel Limited is one of the more detailed Australian cases on registered design infringement, particularly because the…
September 14, 2026
When Differences Are Not Enough: Federal Court Finds Ceiling Fan Design Infringed
In Hunter Pacific International Pty Ltd v Martec Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 796, the Federal Court considered how far a competing product can depart from a registered design before those…
September 9, 2026
TRIDENT v TRIDENT: Full Court Clarifies Non-Use, Authorised Use and Corporate Control
A trade mark can survive a non-use attack even when the registered owner cannot initially prove that it used the mark during the relevant period. It can also be used by a related…
August 22, 2026
Limits of Honest Concurrent Use defense: Federal Court Finds SENSES DIRECT Infringed SENSIS
A single vowel and the addition of the word “DIRECT” were not enough to separate SENSES DIRECT from SENSIS. In Sensis Pty Ltd v Senses Direct Mail and Fulfillment Pty Ltd [2019]…
August 12, 2026
Similar Marks, Different Goods: Federal Court Allows DIGITEK Despite DGTEC Resemblance
Trade mark disputes often appear straightforward when two brand names look and sound alike. The position becomes more complicated when those marks are used for products that sit…
August 6, 2026
Shape, Structure and Overall Impression: Federal Court Finds Uniden’s XTRAK Microphone Infringed GME’s Registered Design
In GME Pty Ltd v Uniden Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 520, the Federal Court considered whether the design of Uniden’s proposed XTRAK UHF radio microphone was substantially similar…











