Can a Global Superstar Take Your Trade Mark? Lesson from the “Battle of the Perrys”

The recent decision of the High Court of Australia in Taylor v Killer Queen LLC [2026] HCA 5 marks the conclusion of a significant and highly publicized trade mark dispute. Often…


Navigating Trade Mark and Consumer Law Boundaries in Australia

Market Competition and Consumer Perception: Lessons from the Bohemia Crystal Dispute

The decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Bohemia Crystal Pty Ltd v Host Corporation Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 235 represents a significant moment in Australian trade mark law,…


Assessing the Probability of Deception: A landmark decision from Australian High court

The decision of the High Court of Australia in Australian Woollen Mills Limited v F S Walton and Company Limited [1937] HCA 51 remains an important decision under Australian trade…


Naming Conventions and Deceptive Similarity of Trade mark

The problem with Deliberate Genericization: Lessons from a recent judgment of Federal Court

The decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Container Rotation Systems Pty Ltd v Intermodal Solutions (Group) Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 161 represents a significant development in…


The “Mark Within a Mark”: How Composite Branding Protects Your Core Trade Mark

The decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Trafalgar Group Pty Ltd v Boss Fire & Safety Pty Ltd concerns two interconnected trade mark disputes relating to a device…


BUB8D0

What can or cannot be patented: A Comparative Analysis Globally

In today’s dynamic and competitive landscape of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), understanding what can or cannot be patented is essential for individuals, organizations, and…


Minutes Aristocrat v Commissioner of Patents: Redefining Patentable Subject Matter in Australia

Aristocrat v Commissioner of Patents: Redefining Patentable Subject Matter in Australia

For more than a decade, Australian courts and IP Australia have struggled to develop a consistent and predictable test for assessing as to how the “manner of manufacture”…


Burger

Trade Mark Infringement and the risks of imitation masked as a “tribute”

The case of Hashtag Burgers Pty Ltd v In-N-Out Burgers, Inc [2020] FCAFC 235 is much more than a simple dispute over fast-food naming rights, i.e. it is a definitive lesson in the…


Trust us with your IP Challenges

Let’s get in touch!

Contact Us